Tuesday, February 27, 2007

The rigors of peer review

"Mr. Lu and Dr. Steinhardt said they regretted what they called a misunderstanding. They pointed out that the length of their report was strictly enforced by journal editors, but it did include two footnotes to Dr. Makovicky’s research. None of the referees or editors who reviewed the paper, Dr. Steinhardt said, asked for more attention to the previous research."


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

©2002-2005 by the author